- Read more | Who were the Medici?<\/a> <\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
An important aspect of Henrietta Maria to address is her legacy. How has the Stuart queen been seen through history?<\/h3>\n
She is probably the most reviled consort to have ever worn the crown of the three kingdoms, but she was ultimately a victim of parliamentary propaganda of the period. In her lifetime she was described as the \u201cpopish brat of France\u201d and a whore, and was said to have worn the britches in her marriage. Ever since, she\u2019s been perceived as the original \u201cbad woman\u201d: Eve, the corrupter who seduced her husband into evil.<\/p>\n
![\"""\"]( "\\"\"\"\\"\/")
<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>Portrait of Queen Henrietta Maria of France (1609-1669) queen consort of England, Scotland, and Ireland as the wife of King Charles I (Photo by Photo 12\/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/div>\n How did she come to be so hated?<\/h3>\n
As the old adage goes, history is written by the victors \u2013 those who overthrew the house of Stuart in 1688. A myth then grew up that English Protestantism played a pivotal role in the creation of our democracy, and indeed our sense of nationhood. Therefore, being a Catholic, Henrietta Maria was associated with Charles\u2019s authoritarianism and is wrongly assumed to have been, in part, responsible for it.<\/p>\n
Beyond this, I actually think her legacy shaped that of Charles I. To ensure that she is believable in the role of the seductress corrupting him into evil, Charles has to be perceived as weak and feeble. So, though it\u2019s true that he was a sickly child, we often don\u2019t hear that he was actually extremely athletic and physically strong in adulthood.<\/p>\n
How much do we actually know about Henrietta Maria\u2019s character?<\/h3>\n
One of the fascinating things about studying the 17th century is that a myriad of sources exist from different people and places, which provide us with a more well-rounded picture of a person\u2019s life than might be possible in previous centuries. In comparison to some English sources, the French saw Henrietta Maria far more positively: as her father\u2019s daughter, as incredibly brave and as a martyr for her faith through her suffering in support of her husband. They describe a remarkable woman, who was respected for her political and diplomatic acumen.<\/p>\n
We can also get a sense of her personality from her own letters. She wrote many letters \u2013 especially during the Civil War \u2013 and in them she comes across as someone who was very affectionate and passionate.<\/p>\n
Something I particularly like about her is that she seems to have been funny and really quite naughty \u2013 she liked to make light of grim situations. One time, on her way back from Holland to England, horrendous storms plagued her fleet, sinking two of her ships. Fearing that they might die, some of her ladies openly confessed their sins out loud. When they made it to shore, Henrietta Maria then teased them about their secrets. She often made jokes about herself as well \u2013 even when she was in some horrendous situations.<\/p>\n
What type of society was Henrietta Maria born into?<\/h3>\n
Henrietta Maria was born into the fun and feminine French court, where women could speak on stage, advertising a female perspective in a way they did not in the English court. As I mentioned at the start, her mother was also the regent of France for much of her childhood. This must have provided her with a very particular perspective on what was possible for women, and given her a sense that women could, and should, have a voice.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s also important to remember that her father introduced the Edict of Nantes in 1598 (later confirmed by her mother and brother), which gave Protestants religious rights in France. So she came from a society where you could be a Catholic and practise your faith, and you could also be a Protestant and practise your faith \u2013 which was very, very different from England. Her father also firmly believed in forming alliances with Protestant powers against their great rivals, the Catholic Habsburgs. When she married Charles, I think she saw it very much in this tradition.<\/p>\n
- Read more | The Habsburgs: the dynasty that wouldn\u2019t die<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
Would you say that this upbringing encouraged her to be tolerant of other faiths?<\/h3>\n
I\u2019d say so. There\u2019s a great story about when Henrietta Maria first arrived in England in 1625, and she was asked: \u201cCan you stand the Huguenots<\/a> [French Protestants]?\u201d She replied, \u201cWas not my father one?\u201d, because her father had been a Protestant in his youth and later converted to Catholicism.<\/p>\n
Her doctor, who was in charge of caring for her life, was a Protestant. Later on, her dearest and closest friends were not only Protestants, but the leaders of the Puritan-inclined faction at court, who shared similar views in terms of aggression towards the Habsburgs.<\/p>\n
So yes, I\u2019d say she took a rather tolerant view in that respect. I think she hoped she would be able to encourage her husband to offer persecuted British Catholics something similar to the Edict of Nantes.<\/p>\n
- Read more | <\/strong>What was the Habsburg jaw?<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>
What was Henrietta Maria\u2019s own religious life like, both publicly and privately?<\/h3>\n
Henrietta Maria was of course a committed Catholic, and her public standpoint was that she needed to openly protect persecuted British Catholics and set an example to them, as well as to potential converts. She was careful to ensure she attended Catholic mass wherever she was, even though English Catholics were not permitted to attend mass. She was even permitted to build a chapel at Somerset House, which displayed the baroque Mass in all its spiritual power and beauty.<\/p>\n
In terms of her private religious standpoint, we know that she read plenty of spiritual books about the life of Christ. While she was very aware that she was a queen, the daughter and wife of kings and the mother of a future king, she also recognised that she was a human being, like other human beings, so wanted to consider the suffering Christ endured and pursue an inner Christian humility.<\/p>\n
However, there\u2019s another interesting side to Henrietta Maria\u2019s private faith which came from her mother. Because Eve tempted Adam in the Garden of Eden in the Christian faith, women were perceived as flawed, weak and corrupting. What Henrietta Maria\u2019s mother reminded her was that Mary, the virgin mother of Christ and the \u201cnew Eve\u201d, had the ear of Christ and was able to guide him. So the Virgin Mary and everything she represented as a woman, mother and partner became very important to Henrietta Maria.<\/p>\n
How much truth is there in the accusation that Henrietta Maria turned Charles Catholic?<\/h3>\n
There\u2019s no truth to it at all. If you think about it, it doesn\u2019t make any sense. Charles I is a martyr of the Church of England, a Protestant martyr; surely he couldn\u2019t have been Catholic? It just shows how ingrained and ridiculous our prejudices have been against her.
- Read more | Why Charles I had to die<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
It\u2019s also worth pointing out that Charles continued to persecute Catholics throughout his reign. Henrietta Maria managed to mitigate this persecution in the 1630s, and there were no executions for religion during this period \u2013 to the disappointment of some MPs. But Charles was, nevertheless, still enforcing heavy fines on Catholics for not going to Church of England services. Indeed they were even heavier than those of the 1620s.<\/p>\n
Was she really \u201cthe wife who wore the britches\u201d?<\/h3>\n
There must have been times in her life when she wished she was wearing the britches, but she really didn\u2019t. I think her marriage changed after the Bishops\u2019 Wars (1639 and 1640), the second of which Charles lost to the Scottish rebels. As I mentioned earlier, Charles wanted his subjects to worship as he did, but his particular brand of Protestantism was quite elaborate and anti-Calvinist, whereas the Scottish Presbyterians followed the Calvinist tradition.<\/p>\n
After the first of these wars, he was forced to call a parliament \u2013 having not had a parliament for 11 years. Those in parliament were obviously extremely angry about the fact he had ruled without them for so long, so they started stripping him of his power and his chosen ministers. Overall, he was short of advice and help.<\/p>\n
It was at that point that Henrietta Maria stepped up to help her husband, which she continued to do throughout the Civil War. What she did was extremely impressive. Even the king\u2019s enemies said he would never have been able to resist them without her help and support. So I think it\u2019s fair to say that she was an extremely effective partner, but not dominating. She still had to follow his decisions, at least one of which she believed cost him the Civil War \u2013 his refusal to attempt to re-take London in August 1643.<\/p>\n
How did she support Charles during the Civil War?<\/h3>\n
She was actually in Holland during the build-up to the Civil War and in the early months of the conflict. During that period, she raised money and arms for Charles. Most people believed that he would be beaten soundly in the first major battle of the Civil War, but of course he wasn\u2019t, and both friends and enemies agreed that this was largely down to Henrietta Maria. She\u2019d really saved his bacon by raising those arms and sending them back to England for him.<\/p>\n
When she returned to England, she was very helpful in many ways. She managed to encourage defectors, including senior parliamentarian commanders. She also gave a lot of good advice: Charles\u2019s nephew Prince Rupert was extremely upset when she returned to France in 1644, because he\u2019d grown to respect her and her advice enormously. People believed that she was firmer and more reliable than Charles.<\/p>\n
- Read more | Queens know best: survival lessons from powerful historical women<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
How did she continue to support the royalist cause after Charles surrendered?<\/h3>\n
She tried several things. First of all, she attempted to encourage Charles to come to terms with his various jailers \u2013 first the Scots, then parliament and then the New Model Army. When all that failed \u2013 she was in France at this time \u2013 she then supported efforts to raise arms for the second Civil War in 1648. When the royalists lost that as well, Charles was tried as a man of blood and executed, and this had a devastating effect on Henrietta Maria.<\/p>\n
She wanted to retire to a convent at that stage and hide herself away, but Charles wrote to her before his death and said something like: \u201cYou\u2019re vital to my cause and you\u2019re vital to what happens to the children, and you mustn\u2019t do any such thing.\u201d So she did continue to support the royalist cause, but she took on a new persona, using Catholic imagery of the Virgin as the Queen of Sorrows \u2013 you don\u2019t see it so often in England, but elsewhere you\u2019ll see images in Catholic churches of the Virgin Mary with swords through her heart. She hoped allying herself with those who had suffered would make the Catholic royals around her feel guilty for not doing more to help Charles.<\/p>\n
So although sometimes she\u2019s perceived as a sad woman dressed in black, actually we should think of her more like Diana, Princess of Wales, after her divorce. Diana projected this image of a suffering woman, but also a very glamorous woman who understood the suffering of others around her, and people felt a great connection with her because of this. That was also true of Henrietta Maria. She used her diplomatic skills to try and keep the royalist cause alive and still went on raising money for her son, Charles II. She never gave up.<\/p>\n
- Read more | The amazing life of Jeffrey Hudson, the Queen Henrietta Maria\u2019s dwarf<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
In your book, you note how Henrietta Maria was commonly portrayed as a cruel and bigoted mother, especially to her son Henry. What was her relationship with her family actually like?<\/h3>\n
I think her children adored her. I\u2019d argue that her relationship with her third surviving son, Henry, was weaker, but that was because he was a tiny child when the Civil War broke out and he remained in parliament\u2019s care throughout the conflict. By the time he was finally released into her care at the age of about 12, they were strangers to each other.<\/p>\n
In the mid-1650s Charles II\u2019s position was incredibly weak. He had very little support from France or Spain. I think Henrietta Maria believed that if Henry became Catholic, he would be able to marry somebody rich \u2013 or he could become a cardinal, and so have money, power and influence. To have had a Catholic brother would have also demonstrated Charles\u2019s religious tolerance at a time when he was trying to secure the support of the Catholic powers by claiming he would permit British Catholics to practise their faith.
The real tragedy is that when Henry and another son, James, later went to fight on the continent, she wrote letters worrying about them and proclaiming how much she was looking forward to seeing the family be united after Charles II\u2019s restoration. Unfortunately, Henry died a few months after that restoration, and she was devastated by it, so to say she was unloving is wholly untrue.<\/p>\n
How do you think Henrietta Maria should be seen now?<\/h3>\n
Henrietta Maria has been looked at far too much through the male gaze \u2013 it\u2019s time for another perspective. We should try and see her on her own terms, through her eyes. We can then see both her strengths and weaknesses, and uncover the real life of a woman who has been endlessly caricatured, but is utterly fascinating.<\/p>\n
\nHenrietta Maria: Charles I\u2019s warrior queen<\/a><\/h4>\n<\/div>\n
\nDuring her years as queen of England, Scotland and Ireland, Henrietta Maria attracted vicious Puritan abuse \u2013 and occasional volleys of cannon fire. Based on new archival research, Leanda de Lisle profiles a queen who sacrificed her reputation \u2013 and, very nearly, her life \u2013 fighting her husband\u2019s cause in the Civil War<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p><\/div>
![\""Henrietta\"](\""https:\/\/images.immediate.co.uk\/production\/volatile\/sites\/7\/2018\/01\/GettyImages-903372780-122ff3d-e1628758701895.jpg?quality=45&resize=556,556"\" "\\"\"Henrietta\\"")
<\/div><\/div> <\/div> <\/section>Leanda de Lisle is the author of\u00a0Henrietta Maria: Conspirator, Warrior, Phoenix Queen<\/em> (Vintage, 2022). <\/strong>Buy it now on Amazon<\/a>, Waterstones<\/a> or Bookshop.org<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n
- Read more | The amazing life of Jeffrey Hudson, the Queen Henrietta Maria\u2019s dwarf<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
- Read more | Queens know best: survival lessons from powerful historical women<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
- Read more | Why Charles I had to die<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
- Read more | <\/strong>What was the Habsburg jaw?<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>
- Read more | The Habsburgs: the dynasty that wouldn\u2019t die<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
![\"""\"](\""https:\/\/images.immediate.co.uk\/production\/volatile\/sites\/7\/2022\/08\/GettyImages-1216141326webready-2fd4c10.jpg?quality=90&resize=620%2C413"\" "\\"\"\"\\"\/")
<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>