The medieval English monarchy claimed its ancestry went back to an Anglo-Saxon adventurer called Cerdic in the sixth century. There are problems with that story. For starters the name is Welsh not Old English, and it\u2019s likely the whole migration narrative told in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle<\/a> in the 890s is an invention. Its real roots lie in a mix of British and Germanic freebooters and foederati (mercenaries) in the Thames Valley who called themselves Gewisse, \u201cthe ones who keep their word\u201d. They later became known as West Saxons, positioned west of the Middle and South Saxons. Their ruling elite adopted Christianity after AD 635, but they remained a minor regional kingdom until their rise to power in southern England in the ninth century during the Danish invasions. They then became the dominant partner in the \u201ckingdom of the Anglo-Saxons\u201d, that is, of the Angles of Mercia and the Saxons of Wessex. It is that union that lies behind the first English coronation.<\/p>\n Though Alfred the Great<\/a>\u2019s son Edward the Elder<\/a> seems to have been crowned in AD 900, it is with \u00c6thelstan<\/a> that coronation history really begins, at Kingston on 4 September AD 925. We have a surviving Gospel Book (on which the king swore his oath?), which records the freeing of a slave by the new king at the altar; and a charter naming the Mercian bishops present. The order of service can be reconstructed from several surviving manuscripts.<\/p>\n These are the words spoken by the king as his first decree to his people: \u201cI promise to observe these three things to the Christian people subject to me: First that the church and all Christian people preserve true peace at all times. Second I forbid all rapacitates (unjust seizure, robbery, plundering) and all evil doing to all classes of society. Third that in my judgments I will enact equity and mercy, that therefore the kind and merciful God may in turn grant us his mercy.\u201d<\/p>\n This so-called promissio regis drew on political ideas that arose in the Carolingian renaissance. The gap between ideal and reality was huge, of course, but at the core was the idea that the king\u2019s justice should be impartial and protect the poor and downtrodden.<\/p>\n There hasn\u2019t, in fact, been continuity of use, but when the ceremony was revived in 1902, Edward VII<\/a>\u2019s think-tank went back to the Old English text of the coronation, as if to say that royal authority in some sense stemmed from the kingship created in the 10th century.<\/p>\n My dear friend the late Patrick Wormald liked to say that England was the oldest continuously existing state in the world. \u201cWhat about China?\u201d I would say. \u201cContinuous,\u201d he answered, pointing to the great ruptures in Chinese history like the Mongol Conquest in the 13th century. I would still go for China. but it is a remarkable continuity.<\/p>\n For many people today, monarchy is an anachronism, simply a nostalgic focus for national feeling (though some believe it continues to underwrite our class system). But the symbolism of the royal promise still has meaning. Like the Hippocratic Oath it goes to the root of what government is supposed to be about \u2013 even if kings and queens of the past didn\u2019t often live up to those high Carolingian ideals.<\/p>\n![\"""\"](\""https:\/\/images.immediate.co.uk\/production\/volatile\/sites\/7\/2023\/05\/Screenshot-2023-05-04-at-16.09.39-db57bfe.png?quality=90&resize=400%2C413"\" "\\"\"\"\\"\/")
<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>