{"id":33593,"date":"2024-02-23T11:32:00","date_gmt":"2024-02-23T10:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/?p=22214"},"modified":"2024-02-23T13:11:38","modified_gmt":"2024-02-23T12:11:38","slug":"when-was-the-first-international-rugby-match-and-who-played-in-it","status":"publish","type":"rss_feed","link":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/rss_feed\/when-was-the-first-international-rugby-match-and-who-played-in-it\/","title":{"rendered":"When was the first international rugby match, and who played in it?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Scotland and England have long been rivals on the rugby pitch and now compete annually for the Calcutta Cup. But did you know that the two teams first faced one another in the world’s first rugby international match? Dominic Sandbrook considers the occasion on 27 March 1871 <\/p>

By Dominic Sandbrook\n \t\t<\/p>

Published: Friday, 23 February 2024 at 10:32 AM<\/p>

\n\n

To most of the people of Edinburgh, 27 March 1871 was nothing special. As they streamed to work across the city\u2019s bridges, trudging to their workshops and factories in the fine spring air, it seemed just another Monday, heralding the start of another week of toil.<\/p>\n

Yet for local residents interested in the new sports that were taking root in Britain\u2019s industrial cities, it would be a day to remember. In that morning\u2019s edition of The Scotsman,<\/em> an advertisement proclaimed that Raeburn Place, the home ground of the Academical Cricket Club, would be hosting an unprecedented sporting encounter, with entrance costing a shilling a head. At three o\u2019clock, 40 young men from England and Scotland were due to contest the world\u2019s first international rugby<\/a> match.<\/p>\n

When did the first international rugby fixtures begin?<\/h2>\n
There had long been talk of arranging international fixtures. The previous year, an English side had played a team of Scottish exiles at the Oval in London, although they had been playing under the Association (\u2018soccer\u2019) rules, which were not very popular in Scotland. The football world was still dominated by bickering between the champions of different codes, and in January 1871 representatives from 21 English clubs had met in a Regent Street restaurant to try to standardise rugby regulations and eliminate the more violent excesses.<\/p>\n
\n
Read more | Rugby warriors: the rugby-playing heroes of the First and Second World War<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Their neighbours, however, were determined not to be left behind, and a group of Scottish clubs promptly sent an invitation to London. \u201cWith a view of really testing what Scotland can do against an English team,\u201d they wrote, \u201cwe, as representing the football interests of Scotland, hereby challenge any team selected from the whole of England, to play us a match, 20-a-side, Rugby rules, either in Edinburgh or Glasgow.\u201d<\/p>\n
As though determined to confirm suspicions of English insularity, the newly formed Rugby Football Union did nothing about it. But one of London\u2019s oldest clubs, Blackheath, picked up the gauntlet \u2013 and the match was on.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Who played in the first rugby international?<\/h2>\n
To modern eyes, the world\u2019s first rugby international, played by Scotland and England, looks a slightly strange occasion. When the match kicked off, some 4,000 people were packed into Raeburn Place \u2013 tiny by today\u2019s standards, of course, but an extraordinary number by the standards of the day. And the teams\u2019 pre-match preparations were a far cry from the meticulous routines of their modern equivalents. The English players had travelled up the previous night, sleeping on bare boards in a third-class carriage, having paid for their tickets themselves.<\/p>\n
As for the match itself, rugby in the 1870s would look almost unrecognisable to a modern fan. Scoring a try counted for nothing; it merely allowed the scorers to take a kick at goal. Penalties, meanwhile, were unknown, since no gentleman would ever cheat. And given the persistent bickering over the laws, it is a safe bet that few of the 4,000 spectators would have been entirely clear about the rules.<\/p>\n

As for the match itself, rugby in the 1870s would look almost unrecognisable to a modern fan. Scoring a try counted for nothing <\/blockquote> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>\n<\/div>
Still, the next day\u2019s Glasgow Herald<\/em> told its readers that a fine time had been had by all. \u201cThe competitors,\u201d it explained, \u201cwere dressed in appropriate costume, the English wearing a white jersey, ornamented by a red rose, and the Scotch a brown jersey, with a thistle\u2026 The difference between the two teams was very marked, the English being of a much heavier and stronger build compared to their opponents.\u201d However, to the home fans\u2019 delight, the English failed to score during the first 50 minutes, and after the teams had changed ends the Scots began to dominate.<\/p>\n
As might have been predicted, confusion about the rules flared up again, with the English players bitterly complaining about a Scottish try. Some accounts suggest that the Scots had barged their way over the line, others that a player had fumbled the ball, which was a foul in England but not in Scotland. Either way, the fact is that the game ended with Scotland triumphant, having scored one goal and two tries to England\u2019s solitary try. Afterwards, the ball was exhibited in a shop window in Stockbridge, a symbol of Caledonian pride at a time when the newspapers were debating the prospects for Scottish home rule.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Who won the first international rugby match?<\/h2>\n
Yet, in a preview of controversies to come, one of the match umpires, a local headmaster, had not even seen the winning score. Dr HH Almond\u2019s view had been obstructed by the crush on the line, but he had decided to give the verdict to Scotland anyway.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhen an umpire is in doubt, I think he is justified in deciding against the side which makes the most noise,\u201d he said later. \u201cThey are probably in the wrong.\u201d<\/p>\n
$\"The$ \n<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture>\n<\/div>