{"id":8760,"date":"2022-01-10T09:03:00","date_gmt":"2022-01-10T08:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/?p=27758"},"modified":"2022-01-10T09:22:19","modified_gmt":"2022-01-10T08:22:19","slug":"what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague","status":"publish","type":"rss_feed","link":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/rss_feed\/what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague\/","title":{"rendered":"What were women\u2019s lives like during the 17th-century plague?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"rssexcerpt\"><\/p><p class=\"rssauthor\">By GuestEditor\n                \t\t<\/p><p class=\"rssbyline\">Published: Monday, 10 January 2022 at 12:00 am<\/p><hr class=\"no-tts wp-block-separator\"\/><?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" standalone=\"yes\"?>\n<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><body><h3>The reviled nurses<\/h3>\n<p>During the long, grim months of 1665, bubonic plague rampaged through the city of London. As thousands lay sick and dying, someone had to perform the unenviable job of nursing the afflicted through the last moments of their lives. That task invariably fell to women.<\/p>\n<p>When plague broke out, individual parishes were expected to enforce city-wide Plague Orders, which stipulated that two women be appointed to serve as \u2018keepers\u2019 (or nurses) to those found to be infected.<\/p>\n<p>These women were usually elderly or widowed parish pensioners living off charity, and could be coerced into the task with threats to their alms, food or pensions. One woman awaiting execution in Poole, Dorset took on the role of nurse in exchange for a reprieve.<\/p>\n<p>Theirs was one of the toughest jobs imaginable, but sympathy and admiration for the plague-nurses was, it appears, in short supply. As one of the few officials allowed entry to infected houses \u2013 working cheek by jowl with sufferers \u2013 they inspired fear and revulsion among a terrified population. To the physician Nathaniel Hodges they were \u201cwretches [who] out of greediness to plunder the dead, would strangle their patients and charge it to distemper in their throats\u201d. Nurses were also accused of \u201csecretly convey[ing] the pestilent taint from sores of the infected to those who were well\u201d. One nurse was, so the story went, crushed under the weight of goods she had stolen from a plague victim.<\/p>\n<p>And such a reputation was hard to shake. More than 200 years after the Great Plague had claimed its last victim, <a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/period\/victorian\/what-was-florence-nightingale-famous-for-achievements-bicentenary-life-who\/&quot;\">Florence Nightingale<\/a> was lamenting the fact that nursing had traditionally been left to \u201cthose who were too old, too weak, too drunken, too dirty, too stupid or too bad to do anything else\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Yet look beyond such rancorous disapproval, and a more nuanced picture of plague-time nursing emerges. When under quarantine during an outbreak in 1636, an Edward Conway specifically asked for \u201ctwo careful keepers\u201d to be sent to attend to him and his friend. Meanwhile, the nurses\u2019 skills in managing care were such that, towards the end of 1665, a William Godfrey asked that, along with three warders, \u201ca nurse or two\u201d be allowed to continue at the Westminster pest house to keep it secure. The nurse of Mr and Mrs Pearce was valued in such esteem that, when she contracted plague too, she was treated alongside them and \u201ccured\u201d. Samuel Pepys encountered a nurse who \u2013 far from being \u201cstupid\u201d \u2013 demanded \u201c10s. per weeke\u201d to take in a sick girl.<\/p>\n<p>And, contrary to what Florence Nightingale wrote, those who cared for the sick weren\u2019t exclusively \u201cold\u201d, \u201cweak\u201d, and \u201cdrunken\u201d. In fact, women of all classes were well-versed in the secrets of medicine. These included noblewomen like Lady Isham \u2013 who advised her nephew to \u201cware a quill as is filed up with quicksilver\u2026 about your neck\u201d \u2013 and merchant\u2019s wife Mrs Taswell, who gave her son \u201ca herb called angelica, some aromatics and spanish wine\u201d to prevent him catching plague.<\/p>\n<p>In the 1660s, London was home to at least 60 unlicensed female medical practitioners. It\u2019s unclear if they all remained in the capital when plague broke out, but it is interesting to note that, during the outbreak of 1607, a nurse called Alice Wright did stay in the city and had \u201cmany flock to her every day\u201d near Newgate prison.<\/p>\n<ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/period\/medieval\/medieval-queens-of-industry\/&quot;\">How the years after the Black Death briefly became a \u2018golden age\u2019 for medieval women<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul><p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3>The corpse inspectors<\/h3>\n<p>When the plague-nurses could do no more for an infected patient, it was time for the \u2018searchers\u2019 to move in. Searchers were women given the task of inspecting corpses, and reporting, \u201cto the utmost of their knowledge\u201d, what exactly had killed them. The Plague Orders stipulated that each parish elect their own searchers, and that they be women of \u201chonest reputation\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>So why did this task rarely fall to men? It\u2019s probably because women had traditionally taken charge of the deceased \u2013 washing, shaving and dressing a person\u2019s corpse ready for burial.<\/p>\n<p>This was the grimmest of tasks. Searchers were given a checklist of symptoms to look out for on the dead, including the presence of swelling around the neck, carbuncles and tokens. They usually worked in pairs, received payment per body, and were required to identify themselves by carrying a red wand.<\/p>\n<p>Tragically, 1665 turned out to be an incredibly busy year for such women. During the Great Plague, searchers recorded no fewer than 68,596 plague deaths. Their raw data was the basis of the Bills of Mortality that, in turn, provided the only graspable way for contemporaries to monitor the progress of plague in the city. To this day, the Bills of Mortality form the bedrock of any study of early modern plague in London.<\/p>\n<div class=\"&quot;row&quot;\"> <div class=\"&quot;col-10\" offset-1=\"\"> <div class=\"&quot;embed&quot;\"> <div class=\"&quot;template-article__pullquote\" mt-md=\"\" mb-md=\"\"> <blockquote class=\"&quot;pullquote\" heading-4=\"\"> <span class=\"&quot;pullquote__icon\" pullquote__icon--left=\"\" icon-pullquote=\"\" data-grunticon-embed=\"\"\/>Women had traditionally taken charge of the deceased \u2013 washing, shaving and dressing a person\u2019s corpse<span class=\"&quot;pullquote__icon\" pullquote__icon--right=\"\" icon-pullquote=\"\" data-grunticon-embed=\"\"\/> <\/blockquote> <\/div> <\/div> <\/div>\n<\/div> <p>This wasn\u2019t a new vocation. Women had examined the plague dead since at least the 16th century \u2013 we know, from Richelle Munkhoff\u2019s research into plague searchers, that a \u201cMother Benson\u201d and a \u201cMother Sewen\u201d were employed to \u201cserche\u201d for plague victims in the London parish of St Margaret Lothbury as early as 1574.<\/p>\n<p>Like nurses, the searchers often inspired revulsion among their fellow Londoners \u2013 an antipathy only increased by their ability to condemn an entire household to quarantine. It is perhaps this power that led to the belief that searchers could be easily corrupted. According to Thomas Dekker, writing during the outbreak of 1603, people could give \u201ca little bribe to the searchers\u201d to avoid quarantine. The Royal Society statistician John Graunt \u2013 who\u2019s fame is based on the very data the searchers harvested \u2013 opined that they were unreliable and at the mercy of \u201ca cup of ale, and the bribe of a two-groat fee\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>But not everyone shared Graunt and Dekker\u2019s misgivings. In fact, searchers could not only be treated with respect, but often held their positions for many years. Munkhoff\u2019s research has revealed that one \u201cWidow Bullen\u201d performed the role of parish searcher for almost 30 years, paired for the majority of her tenure with a searcher named \u201cWidow Hazard\u201d, who served for 33 years.<\/p>\n<ul><li><strong>Read more | <a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/period\/stuart\/great-plague-17th-century-restoration-london-reaction\/&quot;\">How 17th-century London reacted to the Great Plague<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul><p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3>The first to die<\/h3>\n<p>\u201cThe masculine sex bears the greatest part.\u201d So wrote the statistician John Graunt of a plague epidemic that swept England in 1603, killing thousands. Graunt was right: the 1603 outbreak did indeed send more men than women to their graves. But when it returned to wreak havoc in London in 1665, the exact opposite was true. The question is: why?<\/p>\n<p>Research by the historian Justin Champion has revealed that 168 more women died during the Great Plague than men. This number might seem immaterial, if it weren\u2019t for the fact that \u2013 as Graunt\u2019s words indicate \u2013 during the 17th century men usually died more frequently than women. The death ratio during the Great Plague switched from nine females for every 10 males to 10 females for every 9.9 males. What\u2019s more, having examined three parishes in particular, Champion found an early pre-summer peak in female mortality that far outstripped that of men. In other words, women appear to have caught plague earlier. The reasons for this discrepancy are obscure.<\/p>\n<p>It could be that women\u2019s proximity to the home made them more likely to not only contract the illness, but contract it earlier. Alternatively, it could be that the presence of nurses in the homes of the sick skewed the gender ratio, or even that more men fled the capital than women.<\/p>\n<p>The diarist <a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/period\/stuart\/samuel-pepys-diary-fire-london-cheese-facts\/&quot;\">Samuel Pepys<\/a> and novelist Daniel Defoe (the latter in a fictionalised account) both wrote that women were sent out of the city before men. However, when he travelled to London during the height of plague, the schoolboy William Taswell tells us that he carried messages for households headed by women. Among them was Johanna, his family\u2019s long-time servant and his childhood carer, who, we\u2019re told, contracted plague shortly after his visit.<\/p>\n<hr\/><p><strong>Listen |\u00a0Vanessa Harding describes the events of the 1665 Great Plague and explains how people at the time sought to cope with the disease, on this episode of the <a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/period\/stuart\/surviving-great-plague-1665-vanessa-harding-podcast\/&quot;\"><em>HistoryExtra<\/em> podcast<\/a>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<iframe title=\"&quot;Surviving\" the=\"\" great=\"\" plague=\"\" src=\"&quot;https:\/\/embed.acast.com\/historyextra\/survivingthegreatplague&quot;\" width=\"&quot;100%&quot;\" height=\"&quot;180px&quot;\" scrolling=\"&quot;no&quot;\" frameborder=\"&quot;0&quot;\" style=\"&quot;border:none;overflow:hidden;&quot;\"\/>\n<hr\/><h3>The resourceful survivors<\/h3>\n<p>For all too many Londoners, the Great Plague was a catastrophe with no silver lining. Even those who survived the epidemic had their lives utterly ruined \u2013 among them, for example, was Elizabeth Lingar who lost her husband and two daughters and was registered as needing poor relief in 1666.<\/p>\n<p>But some were able to move on. Betty Mitchell, the young daughter of a Westminster haberdasher, lost her fianc\u00e9 to plague but married his brother. Others made a success of their lives in the post-plague years, with women of means having the best chance of prospering. Anne Maxwell inherited a lucrative printing business following her husband\u2019s death in 1665 and went on to become one of the most prolific printers of the 1660s and 1670s.<\/p>\n<p>Then there are the many thousands of women whose fates have been lost in the mists of time. There are the two women Samuel Pepys bumped into, in the dead of night, weeping as they carried \u201ca man\u2019s coffin between them\u201d; the young girl who, the doctor Nathaniel Hodges tells us, escaped plague-free from quarantine; and the mother who the preacher Thomas Vincent saw carrying the coffin of her child to the New Churchyard. Were these women able to rebuild their lives in the coming decades? We may never know.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Rebecca Rideal is the author of <em>1666: Plague, War and Hellfire<\/em> (John Murray, 2016)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>This article was first published in the <\/em><a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.historyextra.com\/magazine-issue\/august-2017\/&quot;\"><em>August 2017 issue of BBC History Magazine\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/p><\/body><\/html>\n<hr class=\"no-tts wp-block-separator\"\/>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By GuestEditor Published: Monday, 10 January 2022 at 12:00 am The reviled nurses During the long, grim months of 1665, bubonic plague rampaged through the city of London. As thousands lay sick and dying, someone had to perform the unenviable job of nursing the afflicted through the last moments of their lives. That task invariably [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":8761,"template":"","categories":[1],"acf":{"readingTimeMinutes":"8"},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/01\/what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague-scaled.jpg",2560,1600,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/01\/what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/01\/what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague-300x188.jpg",300,188,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/01\/what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague-768x480.jpg",768,480,true],"large":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/01\/what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague-1024x640.jpg",800,500,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/01\/what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague-1536x960.jpg",1536,960,true],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/46\/2022\/01\/what-were-womens-lives-like-during-the-17th-century-plague-2048x1280.jpg",2048,1280,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"importmanagerhub@sprylab.com","author_link":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/author\/importmanagerhubsprylab-com\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"By GuestEditor Published: Monday, 10 January 2022 at 12:00 am The reviled nurses During the long, grim months of 1665, bubonic plague rampaged through the city of London. As thousands lay sick and dying, someone had to perform the unenviable job of nursing the afflicted through the last moments of their lives. That task invariably&hellip;","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rss_feed\/8760"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rss_feed"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/rss_feed"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbchistory\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}