By

Published: Wednesday, 25 September 2024 at 08:46 AM


‘Genius is close to madness’. The phrase is still widely repeated as though it were a self-evident truth. And when such luminaries as pop-phenomenon Lady Gaga inform us that she prays ‘for the gift of insanity’ – in order to make her like the ‘great creative people’ she admires – then it seems the idea is a long way from dying out. 

Praying ‘for the gift of insanity’: Lady Gaga in concert, 2022. Pic: Samir Hussein/Getty Images for Live Nation – Samir Hussein/Getty Images for Live Nation

But there are good reasons to have doubts. In its extreme forms, psychosis – that’s to say, any mental illness so severe that it renders the sufferer incapable of coping with everyday life – is more often creatively fatal than not. Even when it isn’t, as the eminent psychiatrist and amateur musician Anthony Storr pointed out, truly psychotic art is often very boring. When the rational conscious mind, the ‘ego’, loses control, its utterances tend to become repetitive, stilted, formulaic: full of the kind of dissociated imagery that makes sense to no one but the sufferer – and perhaps not even to him.

Could it be that, when not crippling, mental illness is creatively stimulating?

But like its physical counterparts, mental illness comes in a huge range of degrees. The mental health charity MIND estimates that one in four adults will suffer at least one episode of depression, yet for most of their lives most of these people will function perfectly normally. Could it be that, when not crippling, mental illness is creatively stimulating, even helping to produce great works of art? 

The source of the ‘genius is close to madness’ statement appears to be a couplet in John Dryden’s poem Absolom and Achitophel of 1681: ‘Great wits are sure to madness near allied, / And thin partitions do their bounds divide.’

The artist to see into the unconscious, nocturnal regions of the mind… but is not overwhelmed by them

What is striking about Dryden’s thought is the suggestion that great creative intelligence is near to madness, not congruent with it: the two states are separated by ‘thin partitions’. The point is that the partitions are thin enough to allow the artist to see into the unconscious, nocturnal regions of the mind that emerge unmediated in psychosis, but that they still remain strong enough to prevent the artist from being overwhelmed by them. 

Mental illness and classical composers

This may become a little clearer if we look at the works of four composers who appear to have suffered from some form of mental illness at some stage in their lives.

Case study 1: Robert Schumann

Let’s start with Robert Schumann (1810-56), who died insane, in an asylum, after having attempted to drown himself in the River Rhine.

Portrait of composer Robert Schumann in Vienna, Historisches Museum Der Stadt Wien (History Museum)
Robert Schumann. Pic: DeAgostini/Getty Images – DeAgostini/Getty Images

What caused that final collapse is still a hot topic. Was it syphilis, which he possibly contracted in his early twenties? Or did the extremes of an equally well-attested bipolar disorder (what used to be called ‘manic depression’) finally become too much for him?

Whatever the cause of the final breakdown, as Kay Redfield Jamison points out in her classic study of bipolarity and creativity, Touched with Fire, Schumann’s creative pattern is typical of bipolar disorder: periods of intense, rapid creativity followed by episodes – coinciding with the onset of severe, at times suicidal depression – in which he was barely capable of writing a note (as in the winter of 1833-4 and, more devastatingly, 1844-5). 

What is striking is how brilliantly the younger Schumann was able to express these alarming extremes in some of his finest works: in the piano cycles Kreisleriana and Davidsbündlertänze, in the song cycle Dichterliebe, and in the ingenious ‘bipolar’ tonal structure of the String Quartet Op. 41 No. 1. If Anthony Storr is right, then his ability to do so reflects a mind at least temporarily ‘in focus’.