{"id":6186,"date":"2022-02-13T19:00:15","date_gmt":"2022-02-13T18:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sciencefocus.com\/?p=109912"},"modified":"2022-02-13T19:24:09","modified_gmt":"2022-02-13T18:24:09","slug":"why-do-we-think-there-are-black-holes-in-galaxy-centres-and-not-supermassive-suns","status":"publish","type":"rss_feed","link":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcsciencefocus\/rss_feed\/why-do-we-think-there-are-black-holes-in-galaxy-centres-and-not-supermassive-suns\/","title":{"rendered":"Why do we think there are black holes in galaxy centres and not supermassive suns?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>

By Dr Alastair Gunn\n \t\t<\/p>

Published: Sunday, 13 February 2022 at 12:00 am<\/p>

\n\n

The evidence for supermassive black holes (SMBHs)<\/a> at the centres of most (if not all) galaxies, is both direct and indirect. Observations of \u2018quasars\u2019 \u2013 the extremely bright cores of distant galaxies \u2013 shows that they\u2019re releasing up to a trillion times the energy of a typical star, all within a volume no bigger than the Solar System.<\/p>\n

The only mechanism that can explain this huge energy release is the conversion of gravitational energy into light by a SMBH. Any other kind of object, such as massive stars, simply cannot produce the observed amount of energy. Plus, it appears that stars of more than a few hundred solar masses are unlikely to form because radiation pressure prevents collapse of the \u2018proto-stellar\u2019 cloud.<\/p>\n

Even if extremely massive stars did form, their lifetimes would be too short (a few million years) to account for the number of quasars seen in the Universe. However, the best direct evidence for SMBHs in galaxy cores comes from observations of the motions of stars in the vicinity of the central object. Their extremely high orbital velocities can only be explained if the central object is both extremely compact and extremely massive, in other words, a supermassive black hole.<\/p>\n

Read more:<\/strong><\/p>\n