![\"\"](\"https:\/\/dj9jqhxgw9833.cloudfront.net\/uploads\/sites\/77\/2021\/11\/65GP4A9I5MX07LCRA511N88LS35L-1024x774.jpg\")
TIC 400799224 is misbehaving. This previously obscure faint star appears in the background of images taken by the planet-hunting Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) between March and May 2019, and then again in April and May this year. The images show the star dimming, dropping to 20 per cent of its peak brightness in just a few hours before recovering slightly, dimming again, and ending up back where it started two days later.<\/p>\n\n
Since astronomers started monitoring large numbers of stars with the precision required to catch the transit of tiny exoplanets across the face of their parent stars, there have been a steadily increasing number of \u2018dipping stars\u2019. Kepler, the predecessor of TESS, was particularly useful in spotting them, and was responsible for the identification of the most famous example, Boyajian\u2019s Star. This object, first identified by participants in the Planet Hunters citizen science project, showed such dramatic brightness variations that for a while the most plausible explanation was the presence of an \u2018alien megastructure\u2019 around the star.<\/p>\n\n
Further investigations<\/strong><\/h5>\n\nFollow-up observations soon revealed that intervening dust \u2013 not aliens with grand plans \u2013 were responsible for the behaviour of Boyajian\u2019s Star. In the case of TIC 400799224, there were observations already on hand, thanks to the Evryscope project, which has been scanning the sky nightly since 2017, and ASAS-SN, a survey built to hunt supernovae. These archive observations, plus a targeted follow-up with the global network of telescopes belonging to the Las Cumbres Observatory, also reveal shallower dips that happen frequently, each accounting for a drop of a few per cent in the system\u2019s total brightness, as well as a regular cycle of brightening and fading with a period of about 20 days.<\/span><\/p>\n\nSo what\u2019s going on? So-called \u2018speckle\u2019 imaging, which uses short exposures to capture ultra-sharp images in moments where the air above the observatory is suddenly still, reveals that the system is a binary, with two probably young stars in orbit around each other. The system does shine more brightly than expected in longer-wavelength light, which suggests the presence of dust in the system, and this turns out to be key to the mystery; something is producing substantial amounts of dust which is blocking light from at least one of the two stars.<\/span><\/p>\n\nThe researchers have worked out that, given the size of the dips that we see, if an object the size of the largest asteroid in our Solar System, Ceres, was reduced to rubble it would produce enough dust to keep TIC 400799224 dipping for 8,000 years. Rather than invoke such a catastrophic event, however, the te am think the most likely scenario involves a large orbiting asteroid that is colliding repeatedly with smaller objects that lie in its way, which produces dust with each collision.<\/p>\n\n
Is that the right explanation? Right now I\u2019ve no idea \u2013 that\u2019s why studying these unusual objects is such fun. At a normal magnitude of +12.6, the star is bright enough for backgarden observers to keep an eye on it; whatever is going on around TIC 400799224, more observations from all sorts of telescopes are key to understanding it.<\/p>\n\n
<\/p>\n\n
\n\n
So what\u2019s going on? So-called \u2018speckle\u2019 imaging, which uses short exposures to capture ultra-sharp images in moments where the air above the observatory is suddenly still, reveals that the system is a binary, with two probably young stars in orbit around each other. The system does shine more brightly than expected in longer-wavelength light, which suggests the presence of dust in the system, and this turns out to be key to the mystery; something is producing substantial amounts of dust which is blocking light from at least one of the two stars.<\/span><\/p>\n\n The researchers have worked out that, given the size of the dips that we see, if an object the size of the largest asteroid in our Solar System, Ceres, was reduced to rubble it would produce enough dust to keep TIC 400799224 dipping for 8,000 years. Rather than invoke such a catastrophic event, however, the te am think the most likely scenario involves a large orbiting asteroid that is colliding repeatedly with smaller objects that lie in its way, which produces dust with each collision.<\/p>\n\n Is that the right explanation? Right now I\u2019ve no idea \u2013 that\u2019s why studying these unusual objects is such fun. At a normal magnitude of +12.6, the star is bright enough for backgarden observers to keep an eye on it; whatever is going on around TIC 400799224, more observations from all sorts of telescopes are key to understanding it.<\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n\n
\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/dj9jqhxgw9833.cloudfront.net\/uploads\/sites\/77\/2021\/11\/0NCSM6D5M75741PF0WFBQW01X5Y5-1024x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n