\n\n
Searching in the dark for black holes<\/h4>\n\n
Despite being invisible, these massive objects warp the light around them<\/p>\n\n Black holes are tricky beasts. It\u2019s only a matter of decades since they were considered likely to be mere theoretical constructs: fun solutions to Einstein\u2019s spacetime equations that don\u2019t reflect anything in the real Universe.<\/p>\n\n Now, though, we know there are supermassive black holes at the centres of all large galaxies, and their smaller siblings have been spotted throughout the Milky Way. We detect these black holes through their interactions with their surroundings; we see the material they accrete in the centres of galaxies, and the influence of black holes on their companions in binary systems. What we haven\u2019t found, until now, is a solo black hole.<\/span><\/p>\n\n The problem is that black holes are\u2026 well, black. They don\u2019t emit light, or otherwise announce their presence, but a large international team led by Casey Lam of the University of California, Berkeley, thinks they may have detected the influence of the gravity of a passing black hole on a distant star, via gravitational lensing.<\/p>\n\n When a black hole or other compact object passes in front of a distant star being monitored by sky surveys such as the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) and Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA), two things can happen. The star may appear to brighten and fade, due to the lensed magnification, but it may also seem to shift position. This is the modern equivalent of the experiment carried out by Arthur Eddington and colleagues during a total eclipse of the Sun in 1919, when observing the shift induced by the Sun\u2019s gravity in the apparent position of distant stars lent support to Einstein\u2019s then-new theory of relativity.<\/p>\n\n \u201cWe know there are black holes at the centres of all large galaxies and their smaller siblings have been spotted throughout the Milky Way\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n A slow, slight shift in position is exactly what has been observed by Lam and colleagues. The event is slower than any eclipse, playing out over the course of years, and only one of the five candidate events they consider seems likely to be due to a compact object. The predicted mass of the invisible lens is between 1.6 and 4.2 times that of the Sun; that means if it is a black hole, it lies in the \u2018mass gap\u2019, more massive than the most massive neutron stars and lighter than the lightest black holes.<\/span><\/p>\n\n So which is it? That\u2019s complicated. As well as the two ground-based surveys, data from the Hubble Space Telescope confirms the shift in position is real. But how you combine Hubble\u2019s higher resolution data with the ground-based data matters. If you treat each individual observation as equally reproduceable, the most likely outcome is that the lens was caused by a black hole. If, however, you treat each set of observations as equally accurate, then a neutron star is, just about, most likely.<\/p>\n\n Arguments about statistics are difficult to resolve and, with the alignment that caused the lensing ending, we may never know which is the right answer for this system. But with more data from additional sky surveys coming, this won\u2019t be our only chance of catching a solo black hole with this technique.<\/p>\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/dj9jqhxgw9833.cloudfront.net\/uploads\/sites\/77\/2022\/03\/P1WGI8X703EQUB58R67207D6J3P4-1024x585.jpg\")
\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/dj9jqhxgw9833.cloudfront.net\/uploads\/sites\/77\/2022\/03\/80T3Q09C3T0J5QL98J2RRJZLU761-1024x1024.jpg\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n