\n\n
Fighting for the dark side<\/h4>\n\n
Battles over a neighbour\u2019s floodlight led Stephen <\/strong>Kirkman <\/strong>to propose a new law <\/p>\n\n In September 2020, I was pleased to move into my new home, but shortly after settling in I noticed the floodlight on a block of housing association flats next door. An earlier tenant there used to turn it off using the circuit breaker as a light switch. To my dismay, the circuit was switched back on and the whole of my back garden has been floodlit ever since, all night, every night, activated by a dusk-to-dawn light sensor. Night-sky observing is near impossible. <\/p>\n\n I contacted both the housing association and the local council, at first requesting that the light was switched off. Then I suggested that a new light, shaded, shielded and directed where it needs to be, with a motion sensor, could be installed. The council\u2019s response was that as it did not shine into a bedroom there was nothing that could be done. The housing association was similarly unmoved and stated that \u201cthat light isn\u2019t going anywhere\u201d. I deliberated with them for 15 months and even had my local MP write on my behalf. No joy. <\/p>\n\n That\u2019s when I started to look at the legal situation. Ironically, I began with the Rights of Light Act 1959, which was of some help and gave me the idea of legal protection for rights to the dark. I also studied the Clean Neighbourhoods and Environment Act 2005, eventually finding Part 9.102.(2) and the phrase \u201c…artificial light emitted from premises so as to be prejudicial to health or a nuisance\u201d. This held a glimmer of hope, but it was put out by Defra\u2019s guidance to the act, Statutory Nuisance from Insects and Artificial Light, which says, \u201cAlthough light pollution might interfere with astronomy, it is not necessarily also a statutory nuisance. The statutory nuisance regime is not an appropriate tool with which to address light pollution per se.\u201d <\/p>\n\n Eventually I concluded there is no specific law recognising a right to darkness from the exterior of a property; the regulations are concerned with the impact on health or the hazard impact to road users. If it were noise or antisocial behaviour, or plants growing across a boundary, there would be a legal case. But not with light. Who would try taking a case like mine to court and risk the cost of thousands of pounds when success is not guaranteed? <\/p>\n\n![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/77\/2023\/05\/51bab3de-d169-4975-a3b3-ac14ac85146f.jpg\")
![\"\"\/](\"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/77\/2023\/05\/f828da81-6efe-4c03-9081-08fb7b45ef91.jpg\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/77\/2023\/05\/Stephen-Kirkman-1024x1024.png\")