Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859. His book contains a single abstract diagram to illustrate \u2018descent with modification\u2019 (evolution), a V-shaped tree with groups of organisms as branches, leading to species as twigs. In 1866, Ernst Haeckel drew the first annotated \u2018tree of life\u2019, with three major branches: animals, plants and \u2018protists\u2019. The third group originally included anything that wasn\u2019t fauna or flora, including microscopic organisms.<\/p>\n

More by JV Chamary<\/h4>\n
Animal vision: how do animals see?<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n
Phenotype guide: what it is, it\u2019s relation to the genotype and the effect on evolution<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n
Endosymbiosis guide: what it is and why complex life needs endosymbiosis<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n
Photosynthesis: what it is, how it works and why it fuels life on earth<\/a><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>
<\/p><\/div> <\/section>
How are species put on branches?<\/h2>\n
Similar species are grouped together based on shared characteristics that are assumed to have existed further back along their branch, in a common ancestor. While the characteristics can be physical features such as anatomy \u2013 the only option for extinct species that have left fossils behind \u2013 living things are now typically grouped by genetic similarity. The practice of putting species into groups or clades (from klados, Greek for branch) is called cladistics and reconstructing evolutionary trees is phylogenetics (meaning origin of races).<\/p>\n
Has the tree of life changed over time?<\/h2>\n
Yes. Old textbooks split life into five kingdoms: animals, plants, fungi and protists, plus \u2018monera\u2019 \u2013 single-celled organisms without a nucleus, now known as prokaryotes. But that changed in about 1977, after microbiologist Carl Woese discovered differences in the gene for producing 16S rRNA (a part of a cell\u2019s protein-making machinery) among prokaryotes, suggesting they actually consist of two groups \u2013 namely bacteria and archaea \u2013 which are as distinct from one another as they are from the other kingdoms combined. Along with eukaryotes, whose cells have a nucleus, that gave three major branches on the tree of life.<\/p>\n
Is the metaphor right?<\/h2>\n
Not entirely, as trees capture only a partial picture of evolution. A tree can only show how genes and their associated characteristics are inherited along a vertical route via a branch \u2013 how they\u2019re passed down from one generation to the next (\u2018up\u2019 the tree), from parent to offspring, ancestors to descendants. But genetic material can be transferred between two species on separate branches too. Such \u2018horizontal gene transfer\u2019 is rare in multicellular eukaryotes because a foreign gene would need to overcome two barriers before it could be inherited \u2013 entering a reproductive cell (sperm or egg) and then crossing into the nucleus.<\/p>\n
Why does gene transfer matter?<\/h2>\n
It matters because horizontal transfer can offer new abilities that enable a species to adapt to its environment, such as providing superbugs with genes that confer antibiotic resistance. While rare in complex life, swapping genes is common among microbes. A comparison of distantly-related groups revealed that, on average, 40 per cent of a microbe\u2019s genome (its complete set of genes) comes from ancient transfers. If you draw those gene transfers as connections between branches on the tree of life, the tidy structure ends up looking like a messy web or \u2018network of life\u2019.<\/p>\n
So was Darwin wrong about the tree?<\/h2>\n
No, but its structure is hazy. The tree of life is really a \u2018tree of cells\u2019 whose ever-growing branches divide to reproduce. Like multicellular life, single-celled microbes also reproduce by dividing so, despite horizontal transfer, it should be possible to detect an underlying pattern of branches. In fact, scientists have studied networks of genomes and found \u2018genetic worlds\u2019 of eukaryotes, archaea, bacteria and viruses \u2013 which are connected by thin webs of gene transfer yet remain broadly discrete. If you draw those \u2018worlds\u2019 as branches of life, you see a backbone of evolution that (if you squint) still looks roughly tree-shaped.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
Main image: U.S. Geological Survey\/creative commons<\/p><\/body><\/html>\n
","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
By JV Chamary Published: Monday, 14 November 2022 at 12:00 am Naturalists once put living things on a scale of progress from primitive to advanced, with man as the pinnacle of creation, inspired by the Scala Naturae or Great Chain of Being conceived by Aristotle in about 350BCE. That \u2018ladder of life\u2019 was later replaced […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":22494,"template":"","categories":[1],"acf":{"readingTimeMinutes":"4"},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/44\/2022\/11\/does-the-tree-of-life-reflect-evolution.jpg",700,484,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/44\/2022\/11\/does-the-tree-of-life-reflect-evolution-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/44\/2022\/11\/does-the-tree-of-life-reflect-evolution-300x207.jpg",300,207,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/44\/2022\/11\/does-the-tree-of-life-reflect-evolution.jpg",700,484,false],"large":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/44\/2022\/11\/does-the-tree-of-life-reflect-evolution.jpg",700,484,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/44\/2022\/11\/does-the-tree-of-life-reflect-evolution.jpg",700,484,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/44\/2022\/11\/does-the-tree-of-life-reflect-evolution.jpg",700,484,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"importmanagerhub@sprylab.com","author_link":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcwildlife\/author\/importmanagerhubsprylab-com\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"By JV Chamary Published: Monday, 14 November 2022 at 12:00 am Naturalists once put living things on a scale of progress from primitive to advanced, with man as the pinnacle of creation, inspired by the Scala Naturae or Great Chain of Being conceived by Aristotle in about 350BCE. That \u2018ladder of life\u2019 was later replaced…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcwildlife\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rss_feed\/22493"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcwildlife\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rss_feed"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcwildlife\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/rss_feed"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcwildlife\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcwildlife\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/22494"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcwildlife\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22493"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/bbcwildlife\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22493"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}