Why Jack will forever dream of owning this utterly daft bike

By Jack Luke

Published: Thursday, 23 February 2023 at 12:00 am


Wildly impractical, tantalisingly rare and defiantly weird.

These qualities make the long-discontinued Trek District Carbon one of my dream bikes, and I would argue the brand’s coolest bike ever.

The District Carbon was an ultra-premium, all-carbon, dedicated singlespeed belt-drive bike that absolutely nobody needed – and few could afford at £2,800. That was just £100 less than the broadly equivalent Ultegra-equipped Madone 5.9 of the time.

Even with today’s inflated prices, £2,800 is still an irrational price for a nominally simple singlespeed bike (let alone in 2009), but that was hardly the point.

While I need another daft fixie like a hole in the head, my eBay saved search will forever prowl classified listings waiting for the day I have a go-fast hole in my heart (and a suitably fat wallet).

A short history of the District Carbon – the bike Trek didn’t need to build

""
I’m so glad we’ve moved on from colourful rims.
Trek Bicycles

The original Trek District was a dedicated singlespeed commuter.

Constructed from beefy alloy tubes and finished in a honkin’ grey and orange colour scheme, the bike was designed for day-to-day urban abuse.

But based on a circa-2010 Madone, the District Carbon was an altogether different beast.

""
Dura-Ace 7900 – what a groupset.
Paul Smith – www.smithpic.co.uk

At the time, the Madone was Trek’s all-rounder race bike (which bears more than a passing resemblance to the modern-day Emonda).

I would love to know what led Trek to think this would make a good basis for a singlespeed hack, but the cycling world is all the richer for this seemingly irrational whim.

The District Carbon was available in two builds.

""
The District Carbon was available in a standard drop bar or special-edition flat-bar Livestrong build.
Trek

The first was a stealthy drop-bar build based on finishing kit, tyres, wheels and brakes from Bontrager. This was paired with an FSA crankset and a Gates belt drive.

The stock drop-bar build came in at roughly 7kg depending on frame size, and I still covet it.

A second flat-bar special-edition Livestrong tribute bike was also shown, but this doesn’t appear to have been available to buy.

Eccentric in every sense of the word

""
The rear axle is fixed offset from the centre of the dropout. Turning the dropout around would tension the belt.
Trek

The District’s weird-yet-elegant dropouts appeal to the contrarian part of my brain.

Most singlespeed bikes, including track bikes, hold the rear wheel in slotted horizontal dropouts (technically ‘track ends’ if you want to be a pedant). Moving the wheel fore and aft tensions the chain.

The District Carbon used an eccentric dropout that moved the axle of the hub in a fixed radius (concentrically) around the centre of the dropout. Turning this would tension the belt.

The design would also, in theory, make it possible to run the bike as a fixed gear.

""
The rear end of the bike could be split to fit the belt.
James Huang

Although splittable belts are now commonly available, they weren’t when the District Carbon was produced.

Unlike a chain, a conventional belt drive belt cannot be split. This requires a gap to be built into the frame to enable the belt to be fitted.

Most bikes have a gap at the dropouts (this is how the alloy District worked), or a removable slot built into the seatstays. You would then pass the belt through this slot.

The District Carbon featured a novel design that enabled you to split the chainstays and seatstays at the point they met, sliding the belt between the two.

""
A belt drive and top-shelf carbon. What a time to be alive.
Trek

To have gone to the effort of developing a bespoke arrangement (when track ends would have worked perfectly well) for a bike that would never sell in large numbers is admirably eccentric.

That the bike was designed for a belt drive doubles the oddness factor. Belt drives are designed primarily for urban riding, but this was outwardly very much a road-going bike.

Why not just use a chain like almost every other singlespeed? That would negate the need for a splittable rear end and far more parts are available.

Why would you want a carbon fixie anyway?