The accusation some viewers have made is painfully reductive.

By David Craig

Published: Thursday, 23 February 2023 at 12:00 am


I don’t care what anyone says: it’s fun to ridicule the one per cent. Of course, it does nothing to solve the extremely serious issues of wealth disparity and worker exploitation, but it applies a bit of cool relief to that burning sensation many of us feel.

And I’m clearly not alone in thinking that. The satirisation of the upper classes has become a major trend in pop culture lately – from The White Lotus to Knives Out and Triangle of Sadness – with some arguing that Fleishman Is in Trouble also belongs in this category.

The comedy-drama, which landed on Disney Plus in the UK this week, chronicles the failed relationship between Dr Toby Fleishman (Jesse Eisenberg) and his former wife, Rachel (Claire Danes), who are adjusting to post-divorce life.

They once shared a luxurious apartment in New York City, paid for partly by his wages as an accomplished liver specialist, but mostly by her enormous pay cheque from being a prolific talent agent. They are unmistakably upper class and knowingly run in snobbish circles, but that’s not really what this story is about.

Nevertheless, it has been a point of discourse. Fleishman Is in Trouble was well-received by most upon its North American release last year, but there were some dissenting voices; not least USA Today, which harshly branded its plot as “rich people problems”.

It’s here I should say that the series also follows Libby (Lizzy Caplan), a friend of Toby’s from university, who spends the series in the throes of a deep malaise. She too is upper middle class, with the salary of her lawyer husband allowing her to be a stay-at-home mum in a picturesque suburban neighbourhood – although that isn’t exactly what she wanted for her life.

As we recover from a tenacious case of White Lotus fever and acknowledge class unrest more broadly, I can understand the knee-jerk reaction to view this troubled trio as nothing more than wealthy whiners. But, in this instance, I would encourage a deeper look into the issues at hand.

This isn’t another social satire about deluded poshos – and that’s OK, there are plenty of those knocking around right now. Fleishman Is in Trouble actually touches upon themes which are near-universal, as explained by Taffy Brodesser-Akner, who penned the original book and this adaptation.

In an interview last year, she described the miniseries as “a story about middle age and marriage and divorce, and getting older and nostalgia and lifelong friendship, and parenting and career and ambition”. More concisely, Caplan said “it’s about the whole f**king world”.

That would explain why, as a 25-year-old from a small coastal town in England, I feel personally spoken to by a story about 40-something divorcees in New York City. Though the Fleishmans certainly have privileges derived from their elite status, the themes of their story listed above are ones we all face ourselves – or likely will at some point.