Twenty years on, Angel’s finale still stands up.

By Melissa Parker

Published: Sunday, 19 May 2024 at 07:00 AM


Angel often gets overshadowed by the show it was spun off from, Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

However, its controversial ending has sparked much debate over the years — it isn’t a finale; it’s the show’s ever-present, nitty-gritty mission statement.

From the pilot’s opening moments to the finale’s closing seconds, a well-thought-out plan seemed consistently in place, although it often felt muddled in the middle.

In the debut episode, vampire-with-a-soul Angel (David Boreanaz) moves to LA to start a new life and help those in need. He joins forces with the resourceful Cordelia (Charisma Carpenter) and the half-demon Doyle (Glenn Quinn) to battle supernatural threats.   

We should always go back to the beginning, because it skillfully establishes the setting, develops characters, and lays the groundwork for the entire series. It also, almost effortlessly, ties in the last seconds of the finale.

In showing Angel’s pain and how troubled Doyle coaxes and persuades him out of the darkness, it does so much work in its stripped-backness. Two troubled men, one-on-one, “‘Cause you got potential. And the balance sheet ain’t exactly in your favour.” 

Sarah Michelle Gellar as Buffy and David Boreanaz as Angel in Buffy the Vampire Slayer lying together hugging each other
Sarah Michelle Gellar as Buffy and David Boreanaz as Angel in Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

When the final episode aired, I felt ripped off. But decades later, I get it. I have grown into it. It’s now my favourite ending — I have the biggest soft spot for the characters.       

After all, it’s so painfully, quintessentially Angel to end with the team still fighting, half already dead, and more clearly on their way out.   

Buffy fans who treat Angel as a continuation, an add-on, do it a disservice. Many popular fandom criticisms focus on comparing it to Buffy’s essence and foundations rather than what its own was meant to be — different. In aesthetics, mission statements, thesis, and the way they pull from various eras of life. Buffy is about growing up — Angel is about being grown.  

From the first episode, Angel is an intimate, up-close, staring-you-right-in-the-face experience of addiction, the need for redemption, and how a person earns it. Always with the knowledge that if he experiences pure happiness, he will lose what separates him from the inner monster. 

Those scenes tell us to come and get close. It won’t be pretty; it will get a little gritty and intense, but it’s a conversation we need to have.  

For all the show’s bravado and charisma, for all its reliance on glamourous grime, chiselled jawlines, murderous stare-offs, artfully swishy leather trench coats, trapped ballerinas, a wee little puppet man, “shiny” demons, dubious Irish accents, and even dodgier wigs, there is always a tightness to Angel, a clawing angst, something burrowing under his skin, throwing him off balance.      

After all, the character went from being Liam, the young, drunken layabout, to Angelus, a bloodthirsty serial killer lacking a soul, and then having one thrust upon him as a punishment for his crimes. Separate from the otherworldly nature of the show, Angel is a man who has to live with himself.        

The show ponders the question: What would it do to a man to hear the screams of pain of his victims over and over, to listen to them pleading and begging to carry the knowledge that you were responsible for the most heinous acts imaginable, that your hands had inflicted torture, and that you, in a far-off era of life, relished it? How would that eat at a person?