Yes – though not as much as you might expect.

After playing a major lead role in the first two Fantastic Beasts films, Waterston barely appears in the third, with her absence explained as a consequence of her new role leading the American Aurors’ office. Though of course, this sort of responsibility doesn’t stop the British Head of Aurors (Callum Turner’s Theseus Scamander) from joining the fight.

Apart from a brief glimpse earlier on, the only time we really see Tina in the film is at its conclusion, when her sister Queenie (Alison Sudol) marries muggle Jacob (Dan Fogler). Meeting former love interest Newt (Eddie Redmayne) outside Jacob’s bakery, Tina doesn’t say too much, but apparently reconciles with Newt before her sister’s wedding. It’s implied they may have rekindled their relationship – in the “future” of Harry Potter’s history they’re married, so it makes sense.

And that’s more or less it. During the main action of the film, a role similar to Tina’s is taken by Jessica Williams’ character Eulalie “Lally” Hicks, an American charms expert and wizard teacher who briefly cameo’d in the second Fantastic Beasts movie.

Was Tina Goldstein cut from Fantastic Beasts 3?

Many fans have speculated that Waterston’s role was intentionally cut down for the third film after she voiced public support for the rights of trans people. Many took this as a tacit criticism of Fantastic Beasts screenwriter and creator JK Rowling, whose ‘gender-critical’ views have become more public over the last couple of years.

In 2020, Waterston shared a Guardian article with the headline “Trans women pose no threat to cis women, but we pose a threat to them if we make them outcasts.” She highlighted a part of the article that said: “Sorry, you can’t be a feminist if you’re not for everyone’s human rights, notably other women’s human rights.”

“Because I was associated with Fantastic Beasts, it felt important to communicate my position,” Waterston later told The Independent. “One wondered if they might be grouped in with other people’s views by association.”

Rowling has strongly denied any accusations of transphobia, and fans have wondered whether Waterston’s role in the film was reduced as a result of her comments. It’s hard to say – no-one has spoken publicly about the matter thus far, and Gavia Baker-Whitelaw of The Daily Dot has argued convincingly that Fantastic Beasts’ production timeline doesn’t line up with this course of events.

After all, Warner Bros announced the film’s locations and the fact of Eulalie Hicks’ bigger role as far back as 2019, several months before Waterston would comment publicly on any of these matters.

Filming was also scheduled to begin months before Waterston’s posts, although it was delayed by the pandemic. With that in mind, it could be that Tina’s role was always meant to be small.