{"id":15274,"date":"2022-05-12T15:03:09","date_gmt":"2022-05-12T13:03:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/?p=1643284"},"modified":"2022-05-12T15:22:08","modified_gmt":"2022-05-12T13:22:08","slug":"top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original","status":"publish","type":"rss_feed","link":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/rss_feed\/top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original\/","title":{"rendered":"Top Gun: Maverick review \u2013\u00a0brilliant blockbuster filmmaking improves on original"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"rssexcerpt\"><\/p><p class=\"rssauthor\">By Patrick Cremona\n                \t\t<\/p><p class=\"rssbyline\">Published: Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 12:00 am<\/p><hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/><?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" standalone=\"yes\"?>\n<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><body><div class=\"&quot;editorial-rating-summary\" editorial-rating-summary--=\"\"> <div class=\"&quot;ratings-stars\"> <div class=\"&quot;ratings-stars__icons&quot;\"> <i data-grunticon-embed=\"\" class=\"&quot;icon-rating-star\" icon-star-fill=\"\"\/> <i data-grunticon-embed=\"\" class=\"&quot;icon-rating-star\" icon-star-fill=\"\"\/> <i data-grunticon-embed=\"\" class=\"&quot;icon-rating-star\" icon-star-fill=\"\"\/> <i data-grunticon-embed=\"\" class=\"&quot;icon-rating-star\" icon-star-fill=\"\"\/> <i data-grunticon-embed=\"\" class=\"&quot;icon-rating-star\" icon-star-outline=\"\"\/> <\/div> <span class=\"&quot;ratings-stars__value&quot;\"> <span class=\"&quot;sr-only&quot;\">4.0 out of 5 star rating<\/span> <\/span> <\/div> <\/div> <p>It\u2019s perhaps damning with faint praise to suggest that <a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/movies\/top-gun-maverick-release-date-sequel\/&quot;\">Top Gun: Maverick<\/a> is a better film than its predecessor. For all that Tony Scott\u2019s 1986 original has undoubtedly achieved iconic status \u2013 due in part to a couple of memorable quotes and some admittedly enjoyable action sequences \u2013 it was always a slightly embarrassing display of \u201980s extravagance, a film whose cheesiness is so overbearing that it almost comes across as a parody.<\/p>\n<p>But Joseph Kosinski\u2019s long-delayed sequel, which finally arrives in UK cinemas at the end of this month, is very much the real deal. Swapping the tone of the original for a more reflective, considered approach \u2013 that nonetheless doesn\u2019t skimp on the exhilarating action \u2013 it improves upon the earlier film in just about every way: from the genuine emotion behind the character dynamics to the pure adrenaline rush of the stunning aerial stunts.<\/p> <p>From the moment we\u2019re re-introduced to Tom Cruise\u2019s title character,\u00a0 it\u2019s instantly apparent that Maverick\u2019s modus operandi hasn\u2019t changed one iota in the intervening 36 years. We find him skilfully but recklessly flying an expensive navy plane in his role as a test pilot, before he\u2019s sent packing back to Top Gun for a new assignment at the behest of his friend and former rival Tom \u201cIceman\u201d Kazansky.<\/p>\n<p>Before he leaves, he\u2019s warned in no uncertain terms by his superior (Ed Harris) that he\u2019s quickly becoming a relic of a bygone era. \u201cThe future is coming and you\u2019re not in it,\u201d Harris says, before adding: \u201cYour kind is headed for extinction.\u201d Maverick\u2019s response \u2013 \u201cMaybe sir, but not today\u201d \u2013 seems to be as much Cruise speaking as his character. He may be approaching 60 years old, and filmstars of his ilk might be in relatively short supply these days, but \u2013 as the rest of the film goes on to prove \u2013 he\u2019s still got a lot left in the tank, and clearly has no plans to hang up his boots any time soon.<\/p>\n<p>It comes as no surprise that Cruise is the star of the show from beginning to end. 36 years on from the original (although production on the sequel actually wrapped three years ago) he hardly seems less fresh-faced now than he did as a young 24-year-old, and his charm and charisma show no signs of subsiding. Cruise\u2019s willingness to try ridiculous feats in the name of entertainment, meanwhile, remains unrivaled \u2013 and the numerous stunts are made all the more thrilling by the knowledge that just about everything is done practically.<\/p>\n<p>The supporting performances, meanwhile, complement his star quality excellently, with Miles Teller\u2019s turn as Rooster \u2013 the son of Maverick\u2019s late wingman Goose\u2013 especially worth a mention. Elsewhere, Glen Powell is perfectly cast as the smarmy all-American stud Hangman, Jon Hamm delivers a fine performance as Maverick\u2019s more straight-laced superior Cyclone, and Val Kilmer reprises his role as Iceman to surprisingly emotional effect.<\/p>\n<iframe title=\"&quot;Top\" gun:=\"\" maverick=\"\" official=\"\" trailer=\"\" paramount=\"\" pictures=\"\" width=\"&quot;200&quot;\" height=\"&quot;113&quot;\" src=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/qSqVVswa420?feature=oembed&quot;\" frameborder=\"&quot;0&quot;\" allow=\"&quot;accelerometer;\" autoplay=\"\" clipboard-write=\"\" encrypted-media=\"\" gyroscope=\"\" picture-in-picture=\"\" allowfullscreen=\"\"\/>\n<p>It\u2019s become increasingly common in recent years for films to use nostalgia as a cheap way of getting audiences onside \u2013 expecting plaudits simply for showing fans something they recognise from their childhoods, regardless of whether there\u2019s anything beyond the surface. And while Top Gun: Maverick hits some of the same beats as the original \u2013 including the new mission pilots being unaware that their future instructor is at the bar with them, Rooster\u2019s performance of Great Balls of Fire at the piano, and a topless game of beach football \u2013 the film manages to forge its own path alongside these callbacks.<\/p>\n<p>Crucially, the nostalgia here is different in that it actually serves the story and its themes. Maverick is still stewing on the events of the original, still feeling guilt for Goose\u2019s death, and these feelings are made all the more potent by the fact he\u2019s back in familiar surroundings and coming face to face with his late wingman\u2019s son. These flashes of nostalgia work, then, precisely because they\u2019re echoing the character\u2019s own emotional state.<\/p>\n<p>As in the first film it\u2019s the relationships between the men that are the most compelling \u2013 and indeed this film largely does away with the romantic melodrama aspect of the plot, with nary a rendition of Berlin\u2019s Take My Breath Away in sight. There is still a romance \u2013 Jennifer Connolly stars as a bar owner with whom Maverick has a complicated history \u2013 but their relationship always feels like a B-plot rather than the main thrust of the action, and it\u2019s Maverick\u2019s exchanges with Rooster and Iceman that will ultimately live long in the memory.<\/p>\n<p>And then there are those aerial stunts\u00a0 \u2013 impeccable showcases of technical artistry that culminate in a white-knuckle ride of a final act, one which will produce all sorts of oohs and aahs from even the most hard-hearted cinemagoer. This is blockbuster filmmaking at its brilliant best and proof \u2013 if it was needed \u2013 that Cruise is still among the best we\u2019ve got.<\/p>\n<ul><li><strong>Read More: <\/strong><a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/movies\/top-gun-maverick-soundtrack\/&quot;\"><strong>Top Gun: Maverick soundtrack \u2013 All the songs in the sequel<\/strong><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><p><strong>Top Gun: Maverick is released in cinemas on 27th May 2022.\u00a0<\/strong><strong>While you\u2019re waiting, v<\/strong><strong>isit our\u00a0<a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/movies\/&quot;\">Movies<\/a>\u00a0hub for more news and features or find something to watch tonight with<span class=\"&quot;s1&quot;\">\u00a0our\u00a0<span class=\"&quot;s2&quot;\"><a href=\"&quot;https:\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/tv\/tv-listings\/&quot;\">TV Guide.<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<div><strong>The latest issue of Radio Times magazine is on sale now \u2013\u00a0<a class=\"&quot;in-cell-link&quot;\" href=\"\/\/radiotimes.com\/magazine-subscription?utm_term=evergreen-article&quot;\" target=\"&quot;_blank&quot;\" rel=\"&quot;noopener&quot; noopener noreferrer\">subscribe now<\/a>\u00a0and get the next 12 issues for only \u00a31. For more from the biggest stars in TV, listen to the\u00a0<a class=\"&quot;in-cell-link&quot;\" href=\"\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/podcasts\/&quot;\" target=\"&quot;_blank&quot;\" rel=\"&quot;noopener&quot; noopener noreferrer\">Radio Times podcast<\/a>\u00a0with Jane Garvey.<\/strong><\/div><\/body><\/html>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Patrick Cremona Published: Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 12:00 am 4.0 out of 5 star rating It\u2019s perhaps damning with faint praise to suggest that Top Gun: Maverick is a better film than its predecessor. For all that Tony Scott\u2019s 1986 original has undoubtedly achieved iconic status \u2013 due in part to a couple [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":15275,"template":"","categories":[6,5],"acf":[],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2022\/05\/top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original.jpg",744,495,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2022\/05\/top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2022\/05\/top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original-300x200.jpg",300,200,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2022\/05\/top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original.jpg",744,495,false],"large":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2022\/05\/top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original.jpg",744,495,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2022\/05\/top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original.jpg",744,495,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/uploads\/sites\/56\/2022\/05\/top-gun-maverick-review-brilliant-blockbuster-filmmaking-improves-on-original.jpg",744,495,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"importmanagerhub@sprylab.com","author_link":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/author\/importmanagerhubsprylab-com\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"By Patrick Cremona Published: Thursday, 12 May 2022 at 12:00 am 4.0 out of 5 star rating It\u2019s perhaps damning with faint praise to suggest that Top Gun: Maverick is a better film than its predecessor. For all that Tony Scott\u2019s 1986 original has undoubtedly achieved iconic status \u2013 due in part to a couple&hellip;","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rss_feed\/15274"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/rss_feed"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/rss_feed"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}