Speaking with Express.co.uk<\/a>, he said: \u201cTo be honest, it was fine for me. He gets killed off, which is fine because when they do the next Bond, they\u2019ll completely ignore the fact that he was killed off and Bond will keep going.\u201d<\/p>\n He continued:\u00a0\u201cIt\u2019s so simple. There\u2019s no explanation required is there? Daniel Craig was Bond and now the next guy is alive. They\u2019re not going to have a problem with that.\u201d<\/p>\n Read more:<\/strong><\/p>\n Asked for his thoughts on No Time to Die, Campbell said: \u201cI thought it was interesting. I mean I had mixed reactions to the film. I thought there was some very good stuff in it. I missed a little bit of the humour I think. Probably some of the stunts weren\u2019t as imaginative as some of the other Bonds. But nevertheless, he made a terrific Bond, there\u2019s no question about that.\u201d<\/p>\n When it comes to who will take on the role now that Craig has finished his run, it is still currently up in the air.<\/p> For his part, James Norton, whose name has frequently been mentioned as a possible contender for the part, has said that there is \u201cnothing concrete behind<\/a>\u201d the rumours that he is up for the role.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, Rupert Friend, who was in contention to take on the role before Craig but stepped away from it because of his young age, has said that maybe he\u2019s \u201cgot the scars and the bruises now<\/a>\u201c.<\/p> ![\"Martin](\"https:\/\/images.immediate.co.uk\/production\/volatile\/sites\/3\/2023\/08\/GettyImages-1390167286-f28675e.jpg?quality=90&resize=620%2C413\" "\\"GettyImages-1390167286\\"\/")
<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>