{"id":6875,"date":"2021-11-07T20:18:13","date_gmt":"2021-11-07T19:18:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.radiotimes.com\/?p=1491274"},"modified":"2021-11-07T20:43:09","modified_gmt":"2021-11-07T19:43:09","slug":"why-does-doctor-who-flux-keep-ruining-its-own-cliffhangers","status":"publish","type":"rss_feed","link":"https:\/\/c01.purpledshub.com\/radiotimes\/rss_feed\/why-does-doctor-who-flux-keep-ruining-its-own-cliffhangers\/","title":{"rendered":"Why does Doctor Who: Flux keep ruining its own cliffhangers?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>

By Huw Fullerton\n \t\t<\/p>

Published: Sunday, 07 November 2021 at 12:00 am<\/p>

\n\n

The new series of Doctor Who<\/a> is full of exciting cliffhangers \u2013 so why does the show itself keep ruining them? It\u2019s a bigger mystery than any question posed about Swarm, The Division or the Timeless Child.<\/p>\n

After all, the big marketing push for Doctor Who: Flux primarily focused on its unusual (for modern Who, at least) serialised story, with the standard standalone stories jettisoned in favour of a connected week-to-week adventure.<\/p>\n

This means a few changes \u2013 characters appear across multiple episodes, not everything has to be wrapped up in one week, and there are plenty of mysteries that roll on \u2013 but perhaps most exciting of these is the potential to end every episode with a cliffhanger, before picking up the action again in next week\u2019s episode.<\/p>

\u201cAs a kid growing up in the 1970s, part of what got me addicted to Doctor Who was the cliffhangers,\u201d showrunner Chris Chibnall told Doctor Who Magazine in 2020. \u201cThey were essential to the DNA of the show. That\u2019s not the case in the same way in the modern show. So when you do get the chance to do a cliffhanger now, it\u2019s really exciting.\u201d<\/p>\n

And when COVID forced a change of production for series 13, Chibnall clearly saw his chance to bring back this classic feature of the show. \u201cThere\u2019s a couple of my favourite cliffhangers that we\u2019ve done this year. I think you\u2019ll know [them]\u2026\u201d he told fans during a virtual panel at Comic-Con @Home.<\/p>\n

And in some ways, it\u2019s worked. Taken on their own, the cliffhangers \u2013 the Flux raging through the TARDIS, Yaz about to be consumed by time itself \u2013 have been fairly exciting. Unfortunately, they\u2019re completely undercut by what comes next.<\/p>\n

\""Doctor\"<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>\n

For both of its first two episodes, the serialised Flux has concluded the action with huge moments of peril, some or all of our characters potentially about to perish, and no obvious way to escape\u2026 only for their survival to be confirmed just a few seconds later in the Next Time trailer.<\/p>\n

Last week, it was hard to take the threat of the Flux too seriously when we saw the TARDIS gang knocking about in the Crimea in footage played right after the credits. This week, Yaz and Vinder\u2019s danger at the hands of Swarm looks all too real\u2026 unless you wait 30 seconds and see them both investigating a ruined city with the Doctor et al, and getting involved in other sci-fi business.<\/p>\n

Really, it\u2019s a shame. Of course few would expect the series leads to actually be killed off halfway through the series, and we all know the Doctor will get out of any scrapes eventually, but part of the fun is making an audience believe that characters could <\/em>be in real danger. At the very least, the show<\/em> should believe Yaz and Vinder might be killed off, keeping the stakes real for the characters and viewers at home. Revealing seconds later in a trailer that they\u2019re all basically fine feels like a big shrug \u2013 the cliffhanger doesn\u2019t matter, because even the show doesn\u2019t pretend it will materially affect the story in any way.<\/p>\n

\""John\"<\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/source><\/picture><\/div>
BBC<\/i> <\/span>\n<\/div>\n

To be fair, it is a tricky balance. Do you awkwardly cut characters out of the Next Time trailers, when you and everyone watching doesn\u2019t seriously believe they\u2019ll perish? That\u2019s often laughable. Do you drop the Next Time trailers altogether, to preserve the illusion? That might undercut the importance of pulling the audience through week to week.<\/p>\n

Perhaps the answer is somewhere in between, then \u2013 an initial teaser that doesn\u2019t directly contradict the importance of the final scene of this week\u2019s episode, allowing for something more explicit later on in the week once the dust has settled (a little like how new preview images usually crop up on Tuesdays).<\/p>\n

Certainly, there was plenty else in next week\u2019s trailer \u2013 including new characters, a Cybermen attack and much more \u2013 to keep us entertained without knowing for sure what was next for Yaz and Vinder.<\/p>\n

For now, it\u2019s hard to feel like the excitement of Doctor Who: Flux\u2019s cliffhangers last any longer than the length of the end credits. When you\u2019ve got a week to wait between episodes, the show could probably do a bit better than that.<\/p>\n

Read more about Doctor Who:<\/strong><\/p>\n