<\/p>
At the start of his episode of Who Do You Think You Are?<\/em><\/a>, TV quiz show presenter and bestselling crime novelist Richard Osman says he doesn\u2019t know his family history very far back.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m a bit nervous and very excited,\u201d he says. \u201cI\u2019d rather find a pirate than a duke, that\u2019s for sure, and of course I\u2019m very interested in crime and the underbelly of the world as well. But I guess we\u2019re not in charge of who our ancestors are, are we?\u201d<\/p>\n First, Richard goes to visit his mother in the retirement community where she lives, which inspired his novel The Thursday Murder Club<\/em><\/a>. They reminisce about Richard\u2019s grandfather, Thomas \u2018Fred\u2019 Wright, who joined the army to escape an impoverished upbringing in Brighton. His military record says he was a signaller in the Royal Artillery. Richard is pleased to note that his conduct is described as \u201cvery good\u201d.<\/p>\n At the Royal Signals Museum, Richard meets military expert Frank Baldwin. Frank shows him an old newspaper<\/a> article from 1936 reporting that Thomas Wright was charged with the theft of a bicycle as a young man. The magistrate dismissed the case but advised Thomas to talk to the probation officer about how to get a job. This led to Thomas joining the army. Frank also explains that \u201cvery good\u201d in a military record isn\u2019t actually a \u201cvery good\u201d ranking \u2013 that would be \u201cexemplary\u201d. Thomas was probably marked down because he didn\u2019t display the obedient temperament needed of a soldier.<\/p>\n Thomas was in the army from 1936 to early 1939, then, as a reservist, was recalled to service at the start of the Second World War<\/a>. His records show that he was posted in Shrivenham, Wiltshire, where he was responsible for training officer cadets.<\/p>\n At the UK Defence Academy in Shrivenham, Richard meets Professor Daniel Todman. He shows Richard that after his posting in Shrivenham, Thomas was sent to India<\/a>, where he was promoted to regimental sergeant major, supervising up to 1000 men in his unit. His final military record describes him as \u201cexemplary\u201d.<\/p>\n Reflecting on what he\u2019s learned about his grandfather, Richard says: \u201cI carry him with me always, his wisdom and his strength and his kindness\u2026 So much of who I am, I owe to him.\u201d<\/p>\n Next, Richard wants to take his family tree further back. In Brighton, near where he grew up, he visits St Nicholas parish church, where his 4x great grandparents Gabriel Gillam and Mary Shrivell were married<\/a> and their children were baptised<\/a>. The records say that Gabriel worked as a fisherman.<\/p>\n Gabriel lived in a time of change in Brighton, when the city was increasingly popular as a holiday destination for the wealthy, while local fishing communities lived in poverty. In 1852, Gabriel was fined for smuggling. Four of Gabriel and Mary\u2019s eight children died in infancy.<\/p>\n Local historian Geoffrey Mead shows Richard newspaper cuttings from 1831, which tell how Gabriel Gillam was involved in the discovery of a body. Gabriel and another man, David Mascall, became suspicious when they dug up the ground and saw what looked like a woman\u2019s dress. They went away, but when Gabriel discussed the matter with his wife and mother, they went back. They dug up more of the dress and called a local constable, who helped them dig up the body of a woman.<\/p>\n \u201cI find it extraordinary,\u201d Richard says, noting the similarities between his ancestors and the characters in The Thursday Murder Club<\/em>, another group who get together to investigate murders.<\/p>\n The dead woman was Celia Holloway, a servant known to have been abused by her husband John Holloway. John and his mistress Ann Kennett were arrested and charged with murder. John acted as his own defence lawyer and cross-examined Gabriel, the key witness, even accusing Gabriel of having buried Celia\u2019s body himself. However, John was found guilty and sentenced to execution, while Ann was acquitted due to lack of evidence. The case attracted huge amounts of press attention and Gabriel\u2019s role in it was even commemorated in broadsides, sheets printed with ballads about the gruesome crime.<\/p>\n